Guest Review: Nestle Lion Cereal

Nestle Lion Cereal Box

Soooo: I’ve been in Copenhagen for a week for work and really had no chance to get very far out of the meeting venue and hotel meeting rooms for anything other than fancy dinners. But who the hell reading this site would care about that when such hotel isolation provides an opportunity to try a cereal that can’t be found on this side of the pond?

Obviously, I had to find a local grocery store to see Europe’s exclusive cereal options, and Lion Cereal is one I have seen in the past but never gave a go. My first thought was, “You know what really sucks about a chocolate and caramel cereal based on a candy bar? The answer is not one damn thing!“

I’m looking at you, Twix. The “candy bar cereal” ball is in your court now.

The best thing about Lion Cereal’s box and label is its tempting promise of chocolate and caramel “taste,” but I have to say that sadly, this was not as “tasty” as I had hoped it would be. It may simply be that hopes were too high but I ultimately prefer Superman Caramel Crunch cereal, which is Lion Cereal’s closest American relative in terms of flavor, texture and size.

Nestle Lion Cereal

Lion Cereal has two distinct colors, and the flavors—when eaten separately—are distinguishable. I do sense chocolate when eating a handful of Lion Cereal’s puffed brown bits, but I can’t say the same about the caramel. The chocolate has a Cocoa Puff-esque flavor, while the caramel is like an understudy to Superman cereal: milder, tamer, and a less faithful representative of its golden ancestor. Despite this, I have never had a Lion Bar (and am currently hanging my head in shame as a result), so I can’t really say whether this bad boy is an authentic breakfast re-creation of the iconic European treat.

Nestle Lion Cereal Box Back

The back of Lion Cereal’s box promises to help you feed your wild hunger and start prepping for the next X Games. Oh, and don’t forget to check-off your daily recommended values of “Taysjyvaa” and “Fulkdorn.”

Maybe one of these is Danish for the ever important riboflavin.

I am all about dry cereal, so Lion Cereal didn’t enthrall me in that form. But as a cereal mix aficionado, I also tried mixing my Lion Cereal with some pumpkin seeds and Teddy Grahams, and it was more than delightful!. And for all of you milk fans, I bet Lion Cereal would leave you some good cereal milk.

I honestly don’t recall the price but it was a decent amount of Danish kroners, probably equal to a little under 5 USD.


 

 

The Bowl: Lion Cereal

The Breakdown: So-so cocoa and not-so-super caramel flavors make for a disappointing dry cereal that only roars to life in milk or a mix.

The Bottom Line (Dry): 6 lion tamers out of 10

The Bottom Line (Mixed): 8.5 Teddy Graham tamers out of 10

P.S. I am taking this guest review as a chance to start “#bringbacksctc” Please, General Mills, bring back the holiday cereal G.O.A.T.: Sugar Cookie Toast Crunch!

5 responses »

  1. Absolutely no flavour, the milk is more tasty than the cereal!!
    Wouldn’t recommend and certainly will never buy again. If I could get my money back.. I would.
    Sorry Neslet but this one is crap.

  2. so I can’t really say whether this bad boy is an authentic breakfast re-creation of the iconic European treat.
    No, not even close. I had the chance to taste a lot of candy bars and sweets and in my humble opinion lion is and probably will stay he best. And yes, that means Hershey’s devilish can go home, even though thix comes close it will never be able to pass it, kitkat can throw out even more flavors and and lion won’t “wafer” (see what I did here?!)… I mean it’s like a gooey caramel Krispie treat with a wafer in it and coated in good chocolate that has nothing in common with the weird taste in the cereal.

    And that brings us to the cereal. Though you don’t know the candy bar you almost nailed it. The chocolate taste is there but not good (compared to nesquik cereal or cocoa Krispies) and the caramel taste is… I don’t know… Maybe it is caramel but not what you would expect when you read caramel. Nevertheless it’s as you wrote: still good, but not great and not even close to the amazing taste of the bar.

    And while I always thought superman caramel crunch is or could be the successor to my all time but discontinued “trio” cereal I probably have the proof that I somehow have to get it somewhere. Even for 10euros xD

    • Superman was definitely underrated in my dopey opinion.

      May I throw out a butterfinger cereal? Charlestown chew?

      Thanks for your thoughts and reading.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *