Review: General Mills Ultimate Taste Comeback (Cookie Crisp & Cocoa Puffs)

General Mills Ultimate Taste Comeback Review Cocoa Puffs Cookie Crisp Boxes

Chocolatey & Fruity: the Adam & Eve of cereal flavors. Or to be more secular, the Dialga & Palkia. As two admittedly broad classifiers. Chocolatey & Fruity nevertheless encapsulate the vast majority of non-Honey Nut cereals—we’ll call that one Giratina.

But while “Fruity” is a very malleable term, representing every cornucopious blend from Trix to Froot Loops, “Chocolaty” deals primarily in shades of subtlety. Sure, texture aside, you could probably tell the tastes of Cocoa Puffs & Pebbles apart, yet daring revolutions in chocolate cereal technology are rare. Usually things just get fudgier, or tweaked with a supplementary flavor enhancement. I want to know what it tastes like when a cereal brand focuses on refining chocolate and chocolatey flavor alone, which is why General Mills’ Ultimate Taste Comeback—particularly the cocoa’d duo of the four—have high expectations to live up to.

Well that, and we’ve already been slightly disappointed by Retro Recipe Golden Grahams, as well as unimpressed that Ultimate Taste Comeback Trix didn’t actually change anything (further evidenced by the fact that when General Mills sent me all four cereals to sample, they included old Trix box art rather than the fresh, big rabbit-headed version seen in Ultimate Taste Comeback graphics).

Enough exposition! Let’s expose these Puffs and Cookies for what they really are…

Ultimate Taste Comeback Cookie Crisp Review

General Mills Ultimate Taste Comeback Review Cookie Crisp Boxes

mediocre. Well, sort of. UTC Cookie Crisp’s box makes a poorly worded promise: “More Chocolate Chip Coooookie Taste!” Aside from irking me, the type of person who needs to set the TV volume to an even number, with five Os, the claim simply isn’t entirely true. This new–old Cookie Crisp does not have more chocolate chip flavor. But it does have a fair deal more cookie flavor, to the point where it nearly obfuscates whatever chocolate flavor remains.

Now, when I say “cookie flavor,” I mainly mean a buttery vanilla sheen, with a touch of brown sugar. Which is on all Cookie Crisp, but I think General Mills really cranked their glazer beam up to 11 for this edition. Don’t get me wrong, buttery vanilla isn’t bad, but as I’ve expressed in countless birthday cake cereal reviews, it gets old after a while. I wish General Mills gave us more morsels for our money, as the chocolate chips here simply can’t compete and only really show up for the first moment of each bite.

But hey, with this little cocoa content, maybe Chip the Wolf could sink his canines into this Cookie Crisp without poisoning himself.

If there’s one positive here, it’s that More Chocolate Chip Coooookie Taste Cookie Crisp seems crunchier than the mealy exoskeletons of its past self. If you do buy this stuff, you probably won’t hate it, but it could’ve been so much better. Milk helps even things out, too, but it’d be easier to just mix the stuff with Cocoa Puffs* to get the chocolate element Cookie Crisp needs.

The Bottom Line: 5.5 micro-dosing wolves out of 10


Ultimate Taste Comeback Cocoa Puffs Review

General Mills Ultimate Taste Comeback Review Cocoa Puffs

*Editor’s correction: do not mix Cocoa Puffs to make Cookie Crisp better. Mix in Cookie Crisp to make Cocoa Puffs salvageable. I have no idea how General Mills managed to release a Cocoa Puffs cereal solely dedicated to adding more chocolate taste, and somehow make it less chocolatey.

Let’s get the good out of the way: like Cookie Crisp, these Cocoa Puffs seem crunchier than their predecessors, somewhat smaller and more compact. This is a textural plus, because it means less cratered corniness to bore nor bore into your palate.

But sadly, the satisfaction stops there. I’ll admit that, aside from during early childhood, Cocoa Puffs has never really been my favorite chocolate cereal. This is because, as its name implies, Cocoa Puffs is less of a dark or milk chocolatey cereal and more of a strictly cocoa powdered confection. It’s particularly funny, because four years ago, Cocoa Puffs released a version with 50% more real cocoa, and that time, the difference was palpably positive! But alas, any net gain from that excursion has now been washed away. Instead, UTC Cocoa Puffs are Cocoa Puffs at like, 50% of their previous cocoa powder power. If anything, maybe there’s a slightly higher degree of toastiness/roastedness in these Cocoa Puffs, as if they pushed the snooze button after the industrial oven dinged, but this is more of a passing curio than a compliment.

Again, much like UTC Cookie Crisp, these Cocoa Puffs aren’t awful, especially when tangentially redeemed by milk, but the sheer disparity between the Cocoa Puffs I was promised and what I received is pretty much unforgivable. Rather than alluding to some unquantifiable past benchmark for a “Taste Comeback,” General Mills should’ve really remixed Cocoa Puffs with little cacao nibs or a Krave-esque chocolate filling.

The Bottom Line: 4 clinically sedated cuckoo birds out of 10


Ultimately, this Taste Comeback needs to go back to square one. I just can’t confidently say that any of the four reformulated cereals are improvements. If General Mills really wants to play the nostalgia card, they need to put their money where our mouths are and be bolder. Restoring the Monster Cereals to their original recipes is a no-brainer, but wouldn’t it be a more marketable commitment to nostalgia if they brought back cereals like Hidden Treasures or Sprinkle Spangles? Sure, you could argue that they’d only appeal to adults, but I’m still young enough (and have listened to enough vaporwave) to know that vintage stuff has a mystic appeal to those who are barred, by temporal circumstance, from experiencing its origins.

Y’now what, forget I said Sprinkle Spangles. I couldn’t bear to see its name fall into the hands of today’s birthday cake cereal ennui.

14 responses »

  1. The cocoa puffs after the change pretty much taste as if they removed all of the cocoa entirely. They could have just renamed them to corn popps and they would at least not have made me so upset.

  2. Oat flour, oat flour, oat flour, oh did I mention oat flour. It’s that simple, they’ve removed an essential ingredient from Cookie Crisp, Monsters, Kaboom, etc & cheapened the taste and quality of their legendary cereals. It’s like they don’t know Google exists and we can research this stuff. What a farce!

    • This. It’s important to understand just how much of an economic incentive the cereal companies have to use corn. If we really want to improve quality (and encourage a crop that is healthier for both body and planet, by the way), then make sure your representatives in the government know that you care about it. For anyone out there new to the dirty world of corn subsidies, check out this interview with Michael Pollan as a good starting point: https://michaelpollan.com/interviews/overabundance-of-corn-and-its-effect-on-the-economy/

      • Post can afford to use oat flour for Chips Ahoy Cereal, surely General Mills can as well. Incompetent brand teams & tone deaf management is the problem at General Mills.

    • @Tim, Exactly. Preach on. It annoys the hell out of me that these cereal companies cheat the consumers by using corn flour and corn meal instead of Oat flour. I used to love the Monsters cereals for Halloween. They barely have any taste to them now and I never bother anymore. Maybe if these cereal companies made great tasting cereal like they did up until the 1990s, more people would actually be buying cold cereals again.

    • Just got a box of Cookie Crisp , and to me it taste like burnt marshmellows . I hate it . Nothing like I remember . I knew they changed it and wasn’t sure until I looked it up . If it’s not broken , don’t fix it .

    • Why don’t general Mills go ahead and sell cookie crisps? So we can get back to the good cereal. They should be ashamed of themselves buying something just to destroy it. It’s disgusting what they did with cookie crisp. However , much money they are , making they would make a thousand times more if they would have just left it alone , damn

  3. Our tastes change we get older and the foods that we once thought were amazing as a kid don’t seem that exciting as an adult. I remember the old Cookie Crisp recipe having a more cookie flavor than more of a chocolate flavor, so I would say that the UTC Cookie Crisp is an improvement. However, that is my opinion based on my memory, so I could be wrong. I really think the readers would have been better serviced if you would have compared the current cereal recipes against their former recipes just to get a more accurate comparison. I wonder if, as an adult now, you might think that the current Monster cereals really don’t taste significantly different than their predecessors that you loved as a child.

    • @Mark. I definitely remember how Count Chocula, Frankenberry, and Yummy Mummy tasted when I was a kid. I used to love the Monster cereals back in the 1980s and early 1990s. I did stop eating them for a while in the mid to later 90s, but I think when I tried them again in the early 2000s, even back then I don’t remember them tasting as good as they did back in the 80s and early 90s. And the last time I tried Chocula and Frankenberry back in 2016, I thought both barely had any flavor to it and it somehow managed to taste worse than it did back in the early 2000s. The flavors of these cereals definitely don’t have the strong flavor they used to have and the cereal pieces themselves don’t have the same crunch texture or taste they used to have. I think the use of Corn Flour or Corn Meal does something to change the taste of the cereal pieces from when they used Oat flour in the 80s and 90s.

    • Mark, I have to disagree. It is a fact that they got rid of oat flour, and I purchased the Monsters regularly before they changed it around Y2K.

      The change in both texture and flavor was obvious and dramatic. I quit buying it in short order, none of this is about “changing tastes.”

      Back on topic, oat flour was once a component of Cookie Crisp, and the fact that General Mills didn’t take advantage of the opportunity to put it back in the recipe is very disappointing.

      General Mills is using phony “nostalgia” marketing to sell us a bill of goods and frankly, it’s insulting.

      If they could get away with putting corn into Cheerios and original Lucky Charms, they surely would.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *